正气天地博客网

2010年8月28日星期六

台愛滋男播毒 數百女恐中招

更新: August 28, 2010 17:44
台愛滋男播毒
數百女恐中招

(台北28日綜合電)台灣台中市衛生局疾病管制科驚爆,一名29歲的工程師,性伴侶氾濫,在詳細檢驗后確認患愛滋病和梅毒,恐多性伴侶已“中鏢”。
當局說,男子自稱從大學時代起就喜歡上網找一夜情,每月性對象逾10人,最高紀錄曾在1個月內與19名不同女子發生性關係,近10年來,就這么維持氾濫的性關係,人數多到他也無法確認,但以1個月10人的估計,10年來恐有數百人“中鏢”。

不敢詳述性史

男 子今年3月出車禍造成頭部外傷,7月下旬突出現下肢無力跌倒,左前臂骨折,查不出病因,本月中轉診台中榮總醫院。院方指男子車禍前就有疲倦、四肢無力等愛 滋病征,卻自認是工作太勞累;之后講話文不對題、記憶力減退,被疑是腦部氣質性病變,但都未找出病因。再加上每次就醫都有媽媽作陪,因此男子不敢詳述性 史。直到院方發現男子肛門潰爛且有皮疹,進一步檢驗后,才發現男子愛滋和梅毒都呈陽性反應。
男子說,根本無法回憶到底曾與多少人有過性行為或可能在哪染上愛滋病,許多人也只是網友,根本不知道對方的真實身分,只說自己性伴侶“人數很多”。



2010年8月27日星期五

普緹供證錄像網民爭睹‧事隔8天上載‧總檢署網站癱瘓

普緹供證錄像網民爭睹‧事隔8天上載‧總檢署網站癱瘓

(吉隆坡)大馬反貪污委員會代表律師拿督阿都拉薩與泰國法醫普緹在“趙明福驗屍案”交手的聆訊錄像終見天日!

事隔8天後,總檢察署終於在總檢察署網站,上載普緹於8月18日來馬供證的聆訊錄像。


有關錄像是於下午3時41分上載至網站,整個錄像的文件大小為805兆字節(805Mb),檔案相當龐大,下載錄像過程或需耗時良久。

儘管民眾可通過這網站下載及觀看有關錄像,不過,網站卻疑承受不了過多的登入者而陷入癱瘓狀態,導致許多人無法從有關網站下載聆訊的錄像。

與阿都拉薩交手成焦點

普緹在供證當天堅稱趙明福非死於自殺,並針對趙明福身上不明傷勢作進一步解釋與分析;不過,除了親自現身作精密分析的供詞外,普緹與反貪委會代表律師阿都拉薩之間的針鋒相對,也成為當天聆訊的焦點。

另外,阿都拉薩在驗屍庭上“出人意表”的揣測性言論及當庭示范趙明福本身如何使用手掐頸及跳樓自殺的情節,也讓人深感興趣。

林立迎:沒按程序上載
總檢長不應歸咎驗屍庭

趙家的代表律師之一林立迎指出,總檢察長丹斯里阿都干尼把錄像沒有上載的責任歸咎於沙亞南驗屍庭是無法被接受的。

他說,身為總檢察署最高領導人,阿都干尼必須確保錄像已按照程序上載至總檢察署網站。

林立迎是針對阿都干尼就錄像沒有上載一事所作出的解釋,發表談話。

針對聆訊錄像終見天日一事,林立迎形容:“遲到總好過沒到!”,但他希望總檢查署未來不會重犯相同的失誤。

總檢長:未獲總檢署談話
媒體不應先行報導

阿都干尼聲稱,他是在媒體報導有關錄像沒有上載的新聞後,才獲悉沙亞南驗屍庭送往總檢察署的錄像檔案是空白及毀壞的。

他不滿媒體在未獲得總檢察署的談話前,就報導有關新聞,並否認總檢察署是因要偏袒一方,蓄意收藏起聆訊的錄像。

阿都干尼接受訪問時,否認總檢察署擁有隱議程的指控,同時,他不滿媒體在沒有取得總檢察署代表的談話,就先行報導有關的新聞。

他認為,這樣的指控對總檢察署來說是不公平的。

DAP MP calls AG’s Chambers biased for omitting inquest video

Info PR: n/a I: 0 L: 0 LD: 148,610,232 I: 0 Rank: 8 Age: Oct 12, 1999 I: 0 whoissourceRobo: yesSitemap: no Rank: 1013 Price: 5238505 Density

AP MP calls AG’s Chambers biased for omitting inquest video

UPDATED @ 02:42:33 PM 25-08-2010
August 25, 2010

Lim accused the AG’s Chambers of protecting Abdul Razak by not uploading the video. — file pic
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 25 — Segambut MP Lim Lip Eng has accused the Attorney-General’s (AG) Chambers of taking sides in the Teoh Beng Hock inquest after it failed to upload the video clip of the latest proceedings as previously done. He said the department had so far posted video clips of each session on its website the following day but has yet to put up the clip of the August 18 proceedings, in which Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand had an exchange of words with Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) lawyer Datuk Abdul Razak Musa.
Dr Pornthip was testifying for the second time at the inquest into Teoh’s death. The DAP political aide was found dead last July 16 on a fifth floor landing at Plaza Masalam, the previous Selangor headquarters of the MACC where he had been questioned overnight.
Dr Pornthip had testified that she disagreed with the findings of Dr Peter Vanezis, the British forensic pathologist brought in by the MACC to observe Teoh’s second post mortem last year. Dr Pornthip was also an observer.
“Why are they [trying] to hide something which is public... from the public?” Lim told a press conference here.
He said he considered the recordings of the inquest public since the AG’s Chambers had made it a point to upload them “from day one” to show that they were transparent and not biased.
“But why not the latest recording? The latest recording is supposed to be the funniest, full of surprises and our government lawyer will be the laughing stock in the whole legal profession and the whole world. So they purposely tried to hide it,” the lawyer said.
During the proceedings, Abdul Razak had questioned Dr Pornthip’s qualifications, which were not recognised in Malaysia, prompting her to inform the court that her university was among the top five in Asia.
“He (Abdul Razak) also doubted whether Pornthip is qualified to help in this Teoh Beng Hock investigation because Pornthip has not jumped off a building before. And he also proposed that Teoh Beng Hock could have strangled himself and he even demonstrated in court,” Lim said.
“All these, the people want to watch it.”
While conceding that the AG’s Chambers were not required to upload videos from the Teoh inquest, Lim dared them to backtrack on their policy of uploading videos from every proceeding thus far.
“Say it. I challenge them to say... ‘it’s up to us whether to put which one and where,’” he said, saying that such an admission of selective uploading would backfire on them.
He was also sceptical of AG’s Chambers’ explanation that they had technical difficulties in uploading the video and might also have misplaced the recording in question.
Lim then demanded that they put up the recording of the August 18 proceedings within 24 hours, failing which they should remove all inquest videos currently online as omitting one defeated the purpose of putting the rest up in the first place.
“If the AG Chambers don’t want to do anything, or even if they put up a tampered one, edited one, I will ask Gobind (Singh Deo) as a lawyer for Teoh Beng Hock’s family and Malik Imtiaz (Sarwar) as a lawyer for the Selangor government, to make a formal application or a formal complaint in the coming inquest,” he said.